Bibliography

  12 examples of stunning science communication. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://shorthand.com/the-craft/12-examples-of-stunning-science-comms/

  AAAS Communication Toolkit | American Association for the Advancement of Science. (n.d.). Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://www.aaas.org/resources/communication-toolkit

  Beck, S., Brasseur, T.-M., Poetz, M., & Sauermann, H. (2022). Crowdsourcing research questions in science. Research Policy, 51(4), 104491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2022.104491

  Bernard, V., & Michaut, M. (2013). Explain Bioinformatics to Your Grandmother! PLoS Computational Biology, 9(10), e1003305. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003305

  Bienvenido, L., & Bourk, M. (2018). Communicating Science and Technology Through Online Video: Researching a New Media Phenomenon. Routledge & CRC Press. https://www.routledge.com/Communicating-Science-and-Technology-Through-Online-Video-Researching-a/Leon-Bourk/p/book/9780367607166

  Boutonnet, B. (2015, December 12). When Science Reporting Goes Wrong –It’s not always the journalist’s or the scientist’s fault. Superhero Neuroscience. https://medium.com/superhero-neuroscience/when-science-reporting-goes-wrong-it-s-not-always-the-journalist-s-fault-a6970e585c6a

  Bowater, L., & Yeoman, K. (2012). Science Communication: A Practical Guide for Scientists | Wiley.

  Brake, M., & Weitkamp, E. (2009). Introducing science communication: a practical guide / edited by Mark L. Brake, Emma Weitkamp. Palgrave Macmillan.

  Bucchi, M. (2017). Credibility, expertise and the challenges of science communication 2.0. Public Understanding of Science, 26(8), 890–893. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662517733368

  Cook, B. R., & Overpeck, J. T. (2019). Relationship-building between climate scientists and publics as an alternative to information transfer. WIREs Climate Change, 10(2), e570. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.570

  Davies, S. R. (2019). Science Communication as Emotion Work: Negotiating Curiosity and Wonder at a Science Festival: Science as Culture: Vol 28, No 4. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1597035

  Davies, S. R., Halpern, M., Horst, M., Kirby, D. S., & Lewenstein, B. (2019). Science stories as culture: experience, identity, narrative and emotion in public communication of science. 18. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.18050201

  Dixon, G., Hmielowski, J., & Ma, Y. (2017). Improving Climate Change Acceptance Among U.S. Conservatives Through Value-Based Message Targeting – Graham Dixon, Jay Hmielowski, Yanni Ma, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1075547017715473

  Follett, R., & Strezov, V. (2015). An Analysis of Citizen Science Based Research: Usage and Publication Patterns. PLOS ONE, 10(11), e0143687. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0143687

  Gustafson, A., & Rice, R. E. (2020). A review of the effects of uncertainty in public science communication. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), 614–633. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520942122

  Hendriks, F., & Jucks, R. (2020). Does Scientific Uncertainty in News Articles Affect Readers’ Trust and Decision-Making? Media and Communication, 8(2), 401–412. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v8i2.2824

  Henville, L. (2020). Effective Science Communication. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-1170-0

  Horst, M. (2013). A Field of Expertise, the Organization, or Science Itself? Scientists’ Perception of Representing Research in Public Communication. Science Communication, 35(6), 758–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/1075547013487513

  Houtman, D., & Vijlbrief, B. (2021). Experts in science communication. EMBO Reports, 22(8), e52988. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202152988

  Houtman, D., Vijlbrief, B., & Riedijk, S. (2021). Experts in science communication. EMBO Reports, 22(8), e52988. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202152988

  Illingworth, S., & Allen, G. (2016). Effective Science Communication. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-1170-0

  Jacobson, S. K., Seavey, J. R., & Mueller, R. C. (2020). Integrated science and art education for creative climate change communication on JSTOR. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26269971?seq=1

  Kappel, K., & Holmen, S. J. (2019). Frontiers | Why Science Communication, and Does It Work? A Taxonomy of Science Communication Aims and a Survey of the Empirical Evidence | Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2019.00055

  Lesen, A. E., Rogan, A., & Blum, M. J. (2016). Science Communication Through Art: Objectives, Challenges, and Outcomes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 31(9), 657–660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.06.004

  M Reincke, C., L Bredenoord, A., & van Mil. (2020). From deficit to dialogue in science communication. EMBO Reports, 21(9), e51278. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.202051278

  Mazer, J. P., McKenna-Buchanan, T. P., Quinlan, M. M., & Titsworth, S. (2014). The Dark Side of Emotion in the Classroom: Emotional Processes as Mediators of Teacher Communication Behaviors and Student Negative Emotions. Communication Education, 63(3), 149–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634523.2014.904047

  Olson, R. (2018). Don’t Be Such a Scientist, Second Edition. Island Press. https://islandpress.org/books/dont-be-such-scientist-second-edition

  Pollard, C. (2016, April 26). 5 Tips For Creating Powerful Key Messages For Your Business. HuffPost. https://www.huffpost.com/entry/5-tips-for-creating-power_b_9775472

  Rakedzon, T., Segev, E., Chapnik, N., Yosef, R., & Baram-Tsabari, A. (2017). Automatic jargon identifier for scientists engaging with the public and science communication educators. PLOS ONE, 12(8), e0181742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181742

  Reif, A., Kneisel, T., Schäfer, M., & Taddicken, M. (2020). Why Are Scientific Experts Perceived as Trustworthy? Emotional Assessment within TV and YouTube Videos. Media and Communication, 8(1), 191–205. https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/2536

  Science Communication: A Practical Guide for Scientists | Wiley. (n.d.). Wiley.Com. Retrieved May 23, 2022, from https://www.wiley.com/en-gb/Science+Communication%3A+A+Practical+Guide+for+Scientists-p-9781119993124

  Science Communication Resources for Scientists. (n.d.). Marine Biological Laboratory. Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://www.mbl.edu/news/science-communication-resources-scientists

  Sciences, N. A. of. (2018). Science Communication in a Politically Charged Environment. National Academies Press (US). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK507372/

  Steijaert, M. J., Schaap, G., & Riet, J. V. (2021). Two-sided science: Communicating scientific uncertainty increases trust in scientists and donation intention by decreasing attribution of communicator bias. Communications, 46(2), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1515/commun-2019-0123

  Suldovsky, B., McGreavy, B., & Lindenfeld, L. (2017). Science Communication and Stakeholder Expertise: Insights from Sustainability Science. Environmental Communication, 11(5), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1308408

  Tools & Resources. (n.d.). COMPASS. Retrieved August 26, 2022, from https://www.compassscicomm.org/tools-resources/

  Trench, B., & Bucchi, M. (2010). Science communication, an emerging discipline. Journal of Science Communication, 9(3), C03. https://doi.org/10.22323/2.09030303

  Vachon, R. (2018). Science Videos. 

https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-319-69512-9

  van Dam, F., de Bakker, L., Dijkstra, A. M., & Jensen, E. A. (2020). Science Communication: An Introduction. World Scientific. https://doi.org/10.1142/11541

  van der Bles, A. M., van der Linden, S., Freeman, A. L. J., & Spiegelhalter, D. J. (2020). The effects of communicating uncertainty on public trust in facts and numbers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(14), 7672–7683. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1913678117

  Vohland, K., Land-Zandstra, A., Ceccaroni, L., Lemmens, R., Perelló, J., Ponti, M., Samson, R., & Wagenknecht, K. (2021). The Science of Citizen Science. https://link.springer.com/book/10.1007/978-3-030-58278-4

  West, J. D., & Bergstrom, C. T. (2021). Misinformation in and about science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15), e1912444117. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912444117

  Wetherhead, D. (2012). Key Message Development: Building a Foundation for Effective Communications – PRsay. http://prsay.prsa.org/2011/12/02/key-message-development-building-a-foundation-for-effective-communications/

  Willoughby, S. D., Johnson, K., & Sterman, L. (2020). Quantifying scientific jargon. Public Understanding of Science, 29(6), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662520937436

  Wolsko, C., Ariceaga, H., & Seiden, J. (2016). Red, white, and blue enough to be green: Effects of moral framing on climate change attitudes and conservation behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 7–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.005
  Zukswert, J. M., Barker, M. K., & McDonnell, L. (2019). Identifying Troublesome Jargon in Biology: Discrepancies between Student Performance and Perceived Understanding. CBE Life Sciences Education, 18(1), ar6. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-07-0118